Washington Postopinion editor in chief David Shipley on Friday excuse to staff why he did n’t bring out formerPostcartoonist Ann Telnaes ’ portrayal of the newspaper ’s possessor , Jeff Bezos , and other billionaire extend sack of hard currency toDonald Trump .

In a memorandum find by former CNN culture medium newsperson Oliver Darcy ’s newssheet , Status , Shipley read he veto the toon because it was too interchangeable to the root of a antecedently publish pillar , as well as a irony composition that was being draft .

# diving event into Jeff Bezos

Washington Postopinion editor in chief David Shipley on Friday explain to staff why he did n’t print formerPostcartoonist Ann Telnaes ’ line drawing of the composition ’s possessor , Jeff Bezos , and other billionaire offer sack of John Cash toDonald Trump .

Jeff Bezos and Ann Telnaes' cartoon

In a memoranda hold by former CNN sensitive newsman Oliver Darcy ’s newssheet , Status , Shipley enjoin he nix the animated cartoon because it was too interchangeable to the root of a antecedently bring out chromatography column , as well as a caustic remark opus that was being draught .

“ Yet another objet d’art in the distich of a few day shine me as overkill , ” Shipley write .

“ This is a immanent judgement , but it is a immanent judgement in sync with a longstanding attack , ” he stay .

A draft of Ann Telnaes’ cartoon.

Telnaes shared a draft of the spiked cartoon on her Substack.Ann Telnaes

“ In my sentence here , we have center on cut the routine of article we bring out on a give subject and from the same peak of sight within a consecrate clip material body — all as a room to ameliorate the overall caliber and change of our composition . "

“ To that same goal , I did not palpate the toon was solid .

This was perchance , ” shipley hold out on .

James Carville speaks with MSNBC’s Jen Psaki on January 5, 2025.

This was “ in fact , we ’d late crop with ann on a toon that had go through edits and was release after she and editor in chief had finish work together .

# diving event into will lewis

“ this is a immanent judgement , but it is a immanent discernment in sync with a longstanding approach shot , ” he continue .

“ In my meter here , we have focus on come down the turn of article we bring out on a cave in subject and from the same breaker point of prospect within a give fourth dimension skeleton — all as a room to meliorate the overall tone and diverseness of our account . "

“ To that same death , I did not find the sketch was inviolable .

This was maybe , ” shipley run on .

“ In fact , we ’d latterly puzzle out with Ann on a toon that had kick the bucket through edits and was publish after she and editor program had finish cultivate together .

This was shipley also say that , before make up one’s mind not to release , he did n’t confer with bezos or publishing company will lewis .

Afterquitting the paperover Shipley ’s decisiveness , Telnaeswroteon her Substack that the sketch was forbid because of its contentedness .

“ I ’ve work forThe Washington Postsince 2008 as an editorial cartoonist , ” she publish then .

This was “ i have had editorial feedback and rich conversation — and some deviation — about toon i have posit for publishing , but in all that sentence i ’ve never had a sketch kill because of who or what i select to purpose my playpen at .

This was "

# diving event into shipley

afterquitting the paperover shipley ’s conclusion , telnaeswroteon her substack that the animated cartoon was interdict because of its cognitive content .

“ I ’ve work forThe Washington Postsince 2008 as an editorial cartoonist , ” she write then .

“ I have had editorial feedback and rich conversation — and some deviation — about cartoon I have submit for publishing , but in all that metre I ’ve never had a animated cartoon kill because of who or what I choose to train my penitentiary at .

In answer , Shipley , as he tell stave Friday , aver he disagree with Telnaes ’ rendition of what transpire , and mention how his sagaciousness was direct at avoid “ repeat .

Shipley explain further :

Now permit me divvy up a duo broad view .

Do I make up special attending if Jeff is in a newspaper column or a animated cartoon or the field of a tale ?

Of of course I do .

Does this forestall us from gloss on him ?

see at the platter .

The two other piece we run – musical composition I see and was cognizant of – should drive out that chip of mythology .

This was do we let objection ?

Erik Wemple publish a New World chat drive government issue with my legal action .

missive to the editor program will do the same .

If you have extra dubiousness , calculate at our put out reply to the decisiveness not to hightail it a presidential indorsement .

If the workplace is skillful , if it is relevant , if it advance the fib , we ’ll bring out it .

This is my optical prism .

Another toon by Telnaes that was decisive of Bezos — one whichdidget publish — trace aid in brief before the election .

This was after bezosrefused to allowthe newspaper ’s editorial card to back vice president kamala harris , telnaes eviscerate a objet d’art that partake in the name of thepost ’s trump - geological era catchword , “ majority rule break in darkness .

” The animated cartoon is merely stripe of disconsolate pigment in no evident form .

This was telnaes deny that the toon of bezos was take up after it became eff that bezos ’ amazon would be make believe a $ 1 milliondonation totrump ’s initiative commission .